Our Blog Post's

Blog Post 1

For our courage project we are most excited about delivering to our clients all over the area, before we expand over Washington and maybe all of the USA we are solely located in the Sammamish/Issaquah area.

Some challenges that we for-see are expanding through all of Washington and the USA. We would also like to share some pros and cons of working in a group.

For our first ideas, some pros are... That we can develop more ideas for our service, and expanding between two people could possibly be easier than one person. Although there may be some cons for working between a group of two, Communication could be an issue when it comes to ideas, and even distribution between two people.

For our second idea (Basketball, which we most likely will not use), some Pros of working in a group are: we could teach each other how to play, also we could both develop at the same rate. Relating to our first idea... there may also be cons, such as: Scheduled conflicts, and distribution between other sports.

Our first of two ideas is a high speed drone delivering service, this service will deliver to people in times of need with-in two hours

Our second idea was for Vincent to help waleed get (a little ) better at basketball.

Blog post 2

It is appropriate to use Wikipedia when you are trying to get some common knowledge about a person, place, or thing. Also another time it is apropriate to use wikipedia is when you want information quick.
A database is trusted information that cant be accessed by another person. It is different then a search engine because a database gives you the best options of data for research but a search engine gives you all sorts of results.
I think the three databases I might explore are culture gram, Britannica, and gale all for ideas because me and Waleed haven't cam up with a final idea and these search engines have multiple view points and lots of articaled to help find a sustainable idea for our project.

Blog Post 3

The two databases i will be

comparing are Britannica and

Gale opposing view points. I

would have to say that gale

opposing view points is the

most reliable When evaluating

with the C.R.A.P test, the first

reason would be because

gale is more cridible,using

quotes and charts from prov-

en evaluations